Laws of nature are not commands but statements of facts. The use of the word "law" in this context is rather unfortunate. It would be better to speak of uniformities in nature. This would do away with the elementary fallacy that a law implies a law giver. If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature, it is punished. On the contrary, we say that the law has been incorrectly stated.
The laws of nature based on observation are
conclusion about the nature of the universe.
true and unfalsifiable.
figments of the observer imagination.
subject to change in the light of new facts.
Correct answer is D
No explanation has been provided for this answer.
Laws of nature are not commands but statements of facts. The use of the word "law" in this context is rather unfortunate. It would be better to speak of uniformities in nature. This would do away with the elementary fallacy that a law implies a law giver. If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature, it is punished. On the contrary, we say that the law has been incorrectly stated.
Laws of nature differs from man-made laws because
the former states facts of Nature
they must be obeyed
they are natural
unlike human laws, they are systematic
Correct answer is A
No explanation has been provided for this answer.
Laws of nature are not commands but statements of facts. The use of the word "law" in this context is rather unfortunate. It would be better to speak of uniformities in nature. This would do away with the elementary fallacy that a law implies a law giver. If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature, it is punished. On the contrary, we say that the law has been incorrectly stated.
If a piece of matter violates nature's law, it is not punished because
it is not binding to obey it
there is no superior being to enforce the law of nature
it cannot be punished
it simply means that the facts have not been correctly stated by law
Correct answer is B
No explanation has been provided for this answer.
Harold, a professional man who had worked in an office for many years had a fearful dream. In it, he found himself in a land where small slug-like animals with slimy tentacles lived on people's bodies. The people tolerated the loathsome creatures because after many years they grew into elephants which then became the nation's system of transport, carrying everyone wherever he wanted to go. Harold suddenly realised that he himself was covered with these things, and he woke up screaming. In a vivid sequence of pictures this dream dramatised for Harold what he had never been able to put into words; he saw himself as letting society feed on his body in his early years so that it would carry him when he retired. He later threw off the "security bug" and took up freelance work.
Harold's dream was fearful because
it brought him face to face with reality
it was full of vivid pictures of snakes
he saw huge elephant in it
in it he saw slimy creatures feeding on people's bodies
Correct answer is A
No explanation has been provided for this answer.
Harold, a professional man who had worked in an office for many years had a fearful dream. In it, he found himself in a land where small slug-like animals with slimy tentacles lived on people's bodies. The people tolerated the loathsome creatures because after many years they grew into elephants which then became the nation's system of transport, carrying everyone wherever he wanted to go. Harold suddenly realised that he himself was covered with these things, and he woke up screaming. In a vivid sequence of pictures this dream dramatised for Harold what he had never been able to put into words; he saw himself as letting society feed on his body in his early years so that it would carry him when he retired. He later threw off the "security bug" and took up freelance work.
The statement that 'he later threw off the security bug' means that
Harold succeeded in overcoming the need for security
Harold stopped giving much importance to dreams
Harold started tolerating social victimisation
Harold killed all the bugs troubled him
Correct answer is A
No explanation has been provided for this answer.