Fill in the blanks with the appropriate pair of phrases:<...
Modern economics does not differentiate between renewable and non-renewable materials, as its method is to measures everything by means of a money price. Thus, taking various alternatives fuels, like coal, oil, wood or water power: the only difference between them recognised by modern economics is relative cost per equivalent unit. The cheapest is automatically the one to be preferred, as to do otherwise would be irrational and 'uneconomic'.
From a Buddhist point of view of course this will not do, the essential difference between non-renewable fuels like coal and oil on the one hand and renewable fuels like wood and water power on the other cannot be simply overlooked. Non-renewable goods must be used only if they are indespensible, and then only with the greatest care and the highest concern for conservation. To use them carelessly or extravagantly is an act of violence, and while complete non-violence may not be possible on earth, it is nonetheless the duty of man to aim at deal of non-violence in all he does.
Fill in the blanks with the appropriate pair of phrases:
The passage suggests that while a modern economist, considers it uneconomic to use ...... form of fuel, a Buddhist economist considers it uneconomic to use ...... form a fuel
a cheap, a renewable
an irrational, an essential
an expensive, a non-renewable
a rational, an unessential
Correct answer is C
No explanation has been provided for this answer.
She said to him, "Why don't you go today?" ...
I did not mind what he was saying, he was only talking through his hat. ...
My car broke down on my way to the railway station. ...
He is so ...... to light that he never leaves the house without sunglasses. ...
He is so ...... that he immediately believed my story of ghosts. ...
Mahesh need not have purchased the bag, means ...... ...
S1: An elderly lady suddenly became blind. P : The doctor called daily and every time he took awa...