According to the passage, Buddhist economists are not in ...
Modern economics does not differentiate between renewable and non-renewable materials, as its method is to measures everything by means of a money price. Thus, taking various alternatives fuels, like coal, oil, wood or water power: the only difference between them recognised by modern economics is relative cost per equivalent unit. The cheapest is automatically the one to be preferred, as to do otherwise would be irrational and 'uneconomic'.
From a Buddhist point of view of course this will not do, the essential difference between non-renewable fuels like coal and oil on the one hand and renewable fuels like wood and water power on the other cannot be simply overlooked. Non-renewable goods must be used only if they are indespensible, and then only with the greatest care and the highest concern for conservation. To use them carelessly or extravagantly is an act of violence, and while complete non-violence may not be possible on earth, it is nonetheless the duty of man to aim at deal of non-violence in all he does.
According to the passage, Buddhist economists are not in favour of
measuring everything in terms of money
using non-renewable sources
economic development
applying non-violence to every sphere of life
Correct answer is B
No explanation has been provided for this answer.
Teachers are not high on the list of corruption because they do not have ...
He is wiring for the last four hours ...
They have been very close friends until they quarreled. ...
According to the Bible, it is meek and humble who shall inherit the earth. ...
What is the opposite of LEND? ...
To cause troops, etc. to spread out in readiness for battle ...
She exclaimed with sorrow that was a very miserable plight. ...
We must go and congratulate him for his brilliant performance. ...
S1: American private lies may seem shallow. P : Students would walk away with books they had not ...