The author is not happy with word 'law' because
Laws of nature are not commands but statements of facts. The use of the word "law" in this context is rather unfortunate. It would be better to speak of uniformities in nature. This would do away with the elementary fallacy that a law implies a law giver. If a piece of matter does not obey a law of nature, it is punished. On the contrary, we say that the law has been incorrectly stated.
The author is not happy with word 'law' because
it connotes rigidity and harshness
it implies an agency which has made them
it does not convey the sense of nature's uniformity
it gives rise to false beliefs
Correct answer is A
No explanation has been provided for this answer.
You have to be a cool customer and be patient if you want to get the best buys. ...
Which sentence should come second in the paragraph? ...
The general policies will relieve the sufferings of the common man. ...
What is the opposite of PERTINENT? ...
A stone that goes on rolling ...... no moss. ...
The crops are dying; it must not had rained. ...
The boy was cured ...... typhoid. ...
The ruling party will have to put its own house ...... order. ...
In order to raise company's profit, the employees ..... ...
It was until many years later that Gandhi became a rebel against authority. ...